Press Release: High Peak Borough Council passes anti-fracking motion

The revolt against fracking across Northern England continued yesterday when High Peak Borough Council passed a motion against fracking.

High Peak in Derbyshire, which borders Greater Manchester, includes part of the Peak District National Park.

The Borough Council has a Conservative majority, but three Tory councillors defied the whip to vote with Labour, Liberal Democrat and Independent councillors in favour of the motion.

The motion highlights the threat to the National Park from fracking, and also to the world famous Buxton mineral water, and calls on the council to support alternative forms of energy.

The government passed regulations before Christmas that would allow fracking under, but not in, National Parks. Campaigners have predicted that an attempt to frack under the Peak District would lead to protests similar to the 1932 Kinder Scout Mass Trespass.

Councillor Ed Kelly (Labour) said "the fact that Councillors from a range of political parties supported my motion to not support fracking in the High Peak clearly shows the high level of concern the majority of people have over fracking. The government needs to put an end to it now."

Full text of the motion

This council therefore resolves to:

Request the Leader, and the Chief Executive of the Council to formally register the
concerns of the Council regarding the use of unconventional gas exploration and extraction
within the High Peak, with the Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC), and to
inform the DECC that this Council would not currently be in a position to support this
form of development.

In addition, this council resolves to approach the Environmental Agency to lend its
support to the development of alternative sources of energy supply more suited to the High
Peak and the Peak District National Park. This council recognises that these would
generate local employment and business opportunities, and have significantly less negative
impact on the integrity of the area. As well as the consideration of large scale
alternative energy supplies consideration should be given to the production of small scale
hydro power as detailed by Friends of the Peak District.

LUDDITES? US?

I couldn’t help but inwardly groan when I read the first paragraph of Dr Godfrey’s letter in last week’s Chronicle. This was because he chose to use the historically specific term ‘Luddite’ to refer to people concerned about fracking, in the sense of a slur (i.e. backward-looking, with an irrational fear of change). 

This common usage is not only an incorrect and inaccurate mis-use, but it’s also an insult to working people from 200 years ago who paid a high price for simply wanting control over their own destiny. 

As someone who has spent a great deal of the last 5 years researching and writing about the Luddites, I have to tell Dr Godfrey that the Luddite opposition to technology was extended only to those forms of it which they perceived as ‘hurtful to commonality’ (i.e. the common good). They had to foresight – correct as it turns out – that their way of life, skills, income and family life would be destroyed by the needs of a small, rich class

of manufacturers (and their allies in local and national government) whose principle reasons for introducing new forms of technology in the cloth trade at that time was to cheapen production costs and accumulate larger profits. The change they feared was that they would be left destitute and their children and future generations would work 60 hour weeks in factories for a pittance, which is exactly what happened. 

The political and economic background to those times is not unfamiliar to us now: a hugely
unpopular Tory government carrying out unpopular wars abroad, trying to enforce economic austerity, whilst doing its best to curtail workers’ organisations at a time of rapid technological change. But if the opponents to fracking were truly Luddites in the mould of those from 200 years ago, then it’s likely the rigs erected at Barton Moss and Balcombe would have been successfully destroyed in the dead of night by now, with the full backing and support of local people I might add.

Things have not quite come to that yet, but Dr Godfrey should be mindful of history, and the fact it took the military occupation of the North and Midlands to quell the Luddites, along with mass executions and deportations.

I am one of those who, with this knowledge, would be proud to be labelled a Luddite, whether it was meant in kindness or as an insult. Furthermore, I’d like to pay tribute to William Greenhough from Mottram-in-Longdendale, John Heywood from Hollingworth & James Crossland from Padfield, all sentenced to transportation to Australia in May 1812 for having the courage of their convictions. To be compared to them would be an honour. 

Richard Holland
Luddite Bicentenary 
ludditebicentenary.blogspot.com

COULD THE PEAK DISTRICT BE FRACKED?

Michael Fallon, Minister of State for Energy, announced before Christmas a ‘UK frackingroadmap’ that could pave the way to fracking in the High Peak.

The BritishGeological Survey also produced a survey in 2013 which showed shale gas reserves located between Glossop and Sheffield north of the A57, and also between Glossop and Chapel-en-le-Frith, including parts of the north of the Peak District National Park

Frack Free Glossop is particularly concerned by the statement made by Lord Howell of Guildford, Secretary of State for Energy under Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and Chancellor George Osborne’s father-in-law, who in a House of Lords debate in July 2013 said “there are large, uninhabited and desolate areas, certainly in parts of the North East, where there is plenty of room for fracking, well away from anybody’s residence, and where it could be conducted without any threat to the rural environment” (3.) Lord Howell later said that he meant to say “the North West”.

Campaigners from Glossop have been regular visitors to Barton Moss in Salford, where protesters opposed to an exploratory well by Igas have been camped since November.

Members of Derbyshire Green Party, including former Green Parliamentary Candidate for the High Peak Peter Allen from Glossop, visited the Barton Moss site on Saturday 5^th January 2013.

Local campaigner Martin Porter said “The Tories are well aware of how unpopular fracking and they fear a revolt across the Home Counties, hence the call by the Chancellor’s father-in-law to frack the north. With protests groups popping up in every town or village at risk of fracking, our almost uninhabited moorlands must look a tempting place to frack. However there are plenty of people ready to defend them. My grandfather took part in1932 Kinder Scout Mass Trespass, and any attempt to frack the Peak District would see direct action on a similar scale.

“We call on anyone who doesn’t want to see fracking here to join us on 12^th January 2013 when Frack Free Glossop will be travelling to Salford for a day of solidarity with the defenders of BartonMoss. Anyone who wants to come along can contact us at frackfreeglossop@inbox.com.”

Shale Gas Deposits Around Glossop

This is what they want to get their hands on

And the extreme close up.

WE REALLY COULD BE FRACKED HERE

Michael Fallon, Minister of State for Energy, today announced a ‘UK fracking roadmap’ that could pave the way to fracking in the High Peak.

Frack Free Glossop believes the government should be taking action to tackle Climate Change and does not believe the UK should be drilling for any more fossil fuels.

Campaigners from Glossop have been regular visitors to Barton Moss in Salford, where protesters opposed to an exploratory well by the company Igas have been camped since November.

Activists have been delaying vehicles entering and leaving the site and on Monday 16 December the group No Dash For Gas placed a 17 meter wind turbine blade across the gates as an early Christmas present for Igas.

Martin Porter of Frack Free Glossop said “There is air pollution, noise, gas flaring and lots of lorries. It requires large amounts of water being brought in and large amounts of waste being taken out. Under the ground bore holes can crack and previously impermeable rock can shatter. Methane can end up where it’s not wanted; in the atmosphere, in the ground water and in people.

“The High Peak may think it is safe as we are on the edge of the Peak District. However the beautiful countryside hasn’t stopped Cuadrilla Resources fracking the forest of Bowland, and Celtique Energie has applied to frack the South Downs National Park.

“Frack Free Glossop will continue to oppose fracking anywhere, because we don’t want it here.”

GOVERNMENT TO OPEN THE WAY FOR FRACKING IN GLOSSOP

Michael Fallon, Minister of State for Energy, is to announce a report on the environmental impact of fracking on Tuesday 17 December. This is expected to be a prelude to the government announcing an expansion of areas licensed for fracking which could include Glossop.

Frack Free Glossop believes the government should be taking action to tackle Climate Change and does not believe the UK should be drilling for any more fossil fuels.

Campaigners from Glossop have regular visitors to Barton Moss in Salford, where protesters opposed to an exploratory well by the company Igas have been camped since November.

Activists have been delaying vehicles entering and leaving the site and on Monday 16 December the group No Dash For Gas placed a 17 meter wind turbine blade across the gates as an early Christmas present for Igas.

Martin Porter of Frack Free Glossop said “Fracking is the last roll of the dice for the fossil fuel industry. Conventional oil has peaked and so they are going in search of harder to reach sources. The obvious effects of a fracking well will be noise, air pollution, gas flaring and dozens of lorries coming and going every day.  The less obvious effects can include contamination of ground water and health problems for local residents if the well is not properly sealed or cemented.

“You can make regulations, but I don’t trust the oil industry to police itself and I doubt an Environment Agency facing a 9% cut in its budget can do it either. Nor can you regulate away the noise or the greenhouse gases. 

“Fracking is not an alternative to coal. The real alternative is renewable energy. Once you’ve had a fracking rig in your back yard you’ll really appreciate a wind turbine.”