I couldn’t help but inwardly
groan when I read the first paragraph of Dr Godfrey’s letter in last
week’s Chronicle. This was because he chose to use the historically
specific term ‘Luddite’ to refer to people concerned about fracking, in
the sense of a slur (i.e. backward-looking, with an irrational fear of
change).
This common usage is not only an incorrect and inaccurate mis-use, but
it’s also an insult to working people from 200 years ago who paid a high
price for simply wanting control over their own destiny.
As someone who has spent a great deal of the last 5 years researching
and writing about the Luddites, I have to tell Dr Godfrey that the
Luddite opposition to technology was extended only to those forms of it
which they perceived as ‘hurtful to commonality’ (i.e. the common
good). They had to foresight – correct as it turns out – that their way
of life, skills, income and family life would be destroyed by the needs
of a small, rich class
of manufacturers (and their allies in local and
national government) whose principle reasons for introducing new forms
of technology in the cloth trade at that time was to cheapen production
costs and accumulate larger profits. The change they feared was that
they would be left destitute and their children and future generations
would work 60 hour weeks in factories for a pittance, which is exactly
what happened.
The political and economic background to those times is not unfamiliar
to us now: a hugely
unpopular Tory government carrying out unpopular
wars abroad, trying to enforce economic austerity, whilst doing its best
to curtail workers’ organisations at a time of rapid technological
change. But if the opponents to fracking were truly Luddites in the
mould of those from 200 years ago, then it’s likely the rigs erected at
Barton Moss and Balcombe would have been successfully destroyed in the
dead of night by now, with the full backing and support of local people I
might add.
Things have not quite come to that yet, but Dr Godfrey
should be mindful of history, and the fact it took the military
occupation of the North and Midlands to quell the Luddites, along with
mass executions and deportations.
I am one of those who, with this knowledge, would be proud to be
labelled a Luddite, whether it was meant in kindness or as an insult.
Furthermore, I’d like to pay tribute to William Greenhough from
Mottram-in-Longdendale, John Heywood from Hollingworth & James
Crossland from Padfield, all sentenced to transportation to Australia in
May 1812 for having the courage of their convictions. To be compared to
them would be an honour.
Richard Holland
Luddite Bicentenary
ludditebicentenary.blogspot.com
Frack Free Glossop

Monday, 6 January 2014
Saturday, 4 January 2014
COULD THE PEAK DISTRICT BE FRACKED?
Michael
Fallon, Minister of State for Energy, announced before Christmas a ‘UK frackingroadmap’ that could pave the way to fracking in the High Peak.
The BritishGeological Survey also produced a survey in 2013 which showed shale gas
reserves located between Glossop and Sheffield north of the A57, and also
between Glossop and Chapel-en-le-Frith, including parts of the north of the
Peak District National Park
Campaigners from
Glossop have been regular visitors to Barton Moss in Salford, where protesters
opposed to an exploratory well by Igas have been camped since November.
Members of
Derbyshire Green Party, including former Green Parliamentary Candidate for the
High Peak Peter Allen from Glossop, visited the Barton Moss site on Saturday 5th
January 2013.

“We call on anyone who doesn’t want to see fracking
here to join us on 12th January 2013 when Frack Free Glossop will be
travelling to Salford for a day of solidarity with the defenders of BartonMoss. Anyone who wants to come along can contact us at
frackfreeglossop@inbox.com.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)